aromantis;100989 said:
well i know that their flesh is poisonous to eat. But i dont think their bite is toxic. I just think it would be great for someone to captive breed them. THis way hobbyists could keep them but not reduce wild populations. As the old saying goes... things alway get worse before they get better. So i just think they should catch several specimens. Have some expert ceph keepers purchase them and start a captive breeding program.
Because it's sort of a personal ambition of mine to have the best possible information on toxicity of cephs, I have to ask:
1) how do you know their flesh is toxic to eat?
2) why do you think their bits are not toxic?
As far as I've been able to tell, Mark Norman has talked about some vague and unpublished research about the flesh being toxic on one TV show. I haven't found any further information on this, so if you have any other source of info, I'd love to add it to our understanding.
In that investigation, he claimed the result that the flesh was toxic, but he didn't really say one way or the other about the bite, although by implication the toxin he found in the flesh probably wasn't found in the saliva. However, I think it's irresponsible for us to have anything here that says that it's safe for people to keep these animals as pets until we have solid evidence of what the risks are, what is and isn't safe in terms of handling, and so forth.
I have no idea why Mark Norman has not published this research; maybe it's in the peer review process or maybe the toxin is being patented or something for medical use (which he implies in the show, but I didn't think that was incompatible with publication of the results.) But it seems to me that it is very concerning that there is known to be a toxin that's potentially fatal to humans involved with these animals, but no details. I don't think we should find out the details by having someone killed by their pet.