• Welcome to TONMO, the premier cephalopod interest community, and birthplace of #WorldOctopusDay and #CephalopodAwarenessDays. Founded in 2000, we are a large community of experts, hobbyists and enthusiasts, some of whom come together when we host our biennial conference. To join in on the fun, sign up. You can also become a Supporter for just $50/year to remove all ads and enjoy other perks. Follow us on Twitter for more cephy goodness.

I fear even the national geographic society should do its homework

OB

Colossal Squid
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
3,101
Just looked at their tusoteuthis: I can (sort of) live with the eyes, but they really made a complete mess of the buccal area, and I think "why?"... Given the budgets for this sort of work, it's beyond me why they didn't get their most basic facts in order. When you are rendering an extinct animal from scratch, you'd think you'd be bothered?

Ah well, musn't grumble, the movie in its entirety looks an absolutely brilliant effort :biggrin2:

PS: The link takes you to the main page only, the tusoteuthis clip is found when doing a site search
 

Sordes

Wonderpus
Registered
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
225
Even BBC and National Geographic are often far away of being scientifically accurate. Just look at the Walking with...-documentations, there are a lot of mistakes too, even in the cases of this which are clearly known by fossils (for example the tooth shape of Basilosaurus...okay, I start again to enter nerdy territory).
 

Clem

Architeuthis
Registered
Joined
Apr 6, 2003
Messages
1,839
I have a sneaky feeling that the Monterey Bay Aquarium's giant squid toy was used as a reference model for Tusoteuthis. Looking at pics of both, shapes and proportions are a match, and the tail and fins are almost identical. I don't have the toy, but I'd guess that the beak and buccal are vaguely molded. Could explain why the Ntl Geo squid looks wonky.

Clem
 

Phil

TONMO Supporter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
3,033
If (a big if) Tusoteuthis was truly a vampyromorph as it has been described, it probably wouldn't have had the two siezing tentacles either. Apparantly there is no evidence that any fossil vampyromorph, as far as I know, had these. As it was a much shallower water animal than Archi, maybe it could have been depicted as capable of colour change, as opposed to the unimaginative dark crimson.

As Clem suggests, it just looks like an Archi model was scanned. Ultimately, I suppose no-one can really say the model is wrong, just rather conservative in its depiction.
 

Phil

TONMO Supporter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
3,033
Hmmm...just watched the little video again. I see what you mean. I have not seen the film but from the clips the animation look cartoon-like and far inferior to the BBCs Walking With..series which is a real pity. The giant nautiloid in that episode with Nigel Marven really knocks this Tusoteuthis into a cocked hat, and that was three or four years ago now.

Oh, here's the NG Tuso link: http://www.nationalgeographic.com/seamonsters/timeline/index.html#tusoteuthis
 

kraken

Hatchling
Registered
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
3
I have that Architeuthis model, and I agree. The NG Tusoteuthis looks almost exactly like it. :archi:
How depressing...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
20,875
Messages
206,840
Members
8,474
Latest member
Thomasjedlicka

Monty Awards

TONMOCON IV (2011): Terri
TONMOCON V (2013): Jean
TONMOCON VI (2015): Taollan
TONMOCON VII (2018): ekocak


Top