- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 280
Hear, Hear!
A volley of very good points, rvangeld! Right with you, matey!
Aquaculture has had a lot of bad press and more often than not only massive pollution events and outbreaks of diseases make the news.
I persist in thinking that's our way forward (especially when it comes to alleviate pressure on the oceans/deep sea). Let's remember that aquaculture (on a global trade scale) is a new thing, Some people have jumped on it to make some cash and don't give a flying f**k about the damage their "all-for-profit" attitude is going to cause. My knowledge of it is some lochs up in Scotland had to be closed off (as best as one can do that) due to pollution/disease.
We can think of quite a few of other fields that have/had similar problems. Crops and pesticides strong enough to kill the people who spread them. Herds and vast areas trampled. Battery farming and the regular outcry of eco-activists denouncing their cruelty. Profit maximising and the very recent fout-and-mouth.... and the list goes on forever.
On the flip side, there has been a number of improvements with time and research. Vaccines, free-range, more user/eco-friendly pesticides, etc. The "kinks" in nowadays' aquaculture will be ironed out and we'll get there.
There is work to be done
As an aside, there used to be great hopes in integrated systems (especially for Tilapias farming iirc) where the sewage/waste was to be recycled as fertiliser for plants with either a commercial/export value or a place in the target fish's feed. I remember reading about those experiments and (more importantly) about the plans for expansion, return on investment and marketability.... You wouldn't happen to know what's the final word on those projects? Are they still in research phase?
TPOTH
A volley of very good points, rvangeld! Right with you, matey!
Aquaculture has had a lot of bad press and more often than not only massive pollution events and outbreaks of diseases make the news.
I persist in thinking that's our way forward (especially when it comes to alleviate pressure on the oceans/deep sea). Let's remember that aquaculture (on a global trade scale) is a new thing, Some people have jumped on it to make some cash and don't give a flying f**k about the damage their "all-for-profit" attitude is going to cause. My knowledge of it is some lochs up in Scotland had to be closed off (as best as one can do that) due to pollution/disease.
We can think of quite a few of other fields that have/had similar problems. Crops and pesticides strong enough to kill the people who spread them. Herds and vast areas trampled. Battery farming and the regular outcry of eco-activists denouncing their cruelty. Profit maximising and the very recent fout-and-mouth.... and the list goes on forever.
On the flip side, there has been a number of improvements with time and research. Vaccines, free-range, more user/eco-friendly pesticides, etc. The "kinks" in nowadays' aquaculture will be ironed out and we'll get there.
There is work to be done
As an aside, there used to be great hopes in integrated systems (especially for Tilapias farming iirc) where the sewage/waste was to be recycled as fertiliser for plants with either a commercial/export value or a place in the target fish's feed. I remember reading about those experiments and (more importantly) about the plans for expansion, return on investment and marketability.... You wouldn't happen to know what's the final word on those projects? Are they still in research phase?
TPOTH